delphipsmith: (library)
delphipsmith ([personal profile] delphipsmith) wrote2010-02-17 11:37 pm

Fodder for the LIS people in the audience

[Warning: Marginally bitter rant ahead]

Yet another entry in the "libraries are dead" debate. I note parenthetically that certain people's statements at EduCause have taken on zombie status and WILL NOT DIE, viz. and to wit, making it even unto the hallowed halls of the New York Times and being referenced as supporting evidence by this jerkwad *ahem* sorry, James Tracy of Cushing Academy. Hell, let's just put all "those old pulpy devices" out of their mizry and burn 'em right now. Pffffft. Wonder what CA's enrollment will be four years from now.

Don't get me wrong. I'm not against digital. But there is flat-out no way the digital repository(ies) out there are sufficient to replace print, Google Scholar and the Gutenberg Project notwithstanding. I pity those CA students. They'll be leaving prep school with a completely distorted view of research, literature, and Western civilization in general.

Oh wait -- it's a prep school (tuition $32K per year, $44K for boarders -- plus that $1500 "technology fee" which probably goes to fund their new all-digital "library"). They probably leave with that anyway.

[identity profile] anna-bird.livejournal.com 2010-02-19 02:36 am (UTC)(link)
Ah, yes, I forgot about that nasty little detail of ebooks through vendors/with DRM are basically rented rather than purchased. Grrr.

Word to your last paragraph - it's not a replacement, it's a supplement, it's a widening of the way, and people who want to go with one format only strike me as exceedingly narrow-minded.

Maybe e-reader folks will create a special waterproof case just for bath-readers...