delphipsmith (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
delphipsmith) wrote2010-07-13 10:16 pm
delphipsmith) wrote2010-07-13 10:16 pm
Entry tags:
Thank you, Bob and Dan
Tested two of my recent short stories in the writing analyzer mentioned by ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
stellamoon and ladyoneill. Pretty funny what it spit out. As a quality check, I went to Project Gutenberg and grabbed some Dickens and Twain. After removing any identifiable names (e.g. Tom Sawyer) I tested them and it got both of them correct, so it's not too far off, I guess.
I'm not quite sure how one manages to write like BOTH these people, but hey, they're both big sellers, so maybe I'm doing OK. Although Dan Brown may not be the highest literary praise, Robert Louis Stevenson isn't bad :)
stellamoon and ladyoneill. Pretty funny what it spit out. As a quality check, I went to Project Gutenberg and grabbed some Dickens and Twain. After removing any identifiable names (e.g. Tom Sawyer) I tested them and it got both of them correct, so it's not too far off, I guess. I'm not quite sure how one manages to write like BOTH these people, but hey, they're both big sellers, so maybe I'm doing OK. Although Dan Brown may not be the highest literary praise, Robert Louis Stevenson isn't bad :)
I write like
Robert Louis Stevenson
Robert Louis Stevenson
I Write Like by Mémoires, Mac journal software. Analyze your writing!
no subject
Now you're messing with Wikipedia's "not to be confused with." Catastrophic Internet paradox!
My husband did the meme with his latest paper and came up with Dan Brown and William Shakespeare. GOD THE POSSIBILITIES ARE LIMITLESS. I want my self-flagellating Shylock!