The Mythopoeic Society just announced their nominees for this year, and I want ALL THE BOOKS. The Gospel of Loki and Songs for Ophelia (because poems!!) both look outstanding, plus there are the two scholarship (aka "meta") categories with tasty things like Michael Saler's As If: Modern Enchantment and the Literary Prehistory of Virtual Reality and Monika B. Hilder's C. S. Lewis and gender series. ::drool::
Literary crushes
10 June 2014 02:35 amMy first crush on a fictional man was at about age eight or nine: Prince Gwydion from Llloyd Alexander's Chronicles of Prydain. Well, how could he not be? With his green eyes and wolf-grey hair and the sword and cloak and also hello, a prince, he was everything that a girl bored with sappy Disney royalty would adore. He didn't waste his time rescuing princesses, he was fighting THE LORD OF DEATH, for Merlin's sake. And I loved that he was noble yet accessible: a prince for working days, as it were, not in the least high and mighty, because he didn't need to be.
My next fictional crush was Laurie from Little Women (so sweet and funny and romantic, and played the piano with such passion -- Jo, how could you turn him down?!) closely followed by Dan from Jo's Boys (my black-eyed wounded rebel soul, I'm still sad he didn't win the heart of Bess).
Then I read Dragonsong and fell hard for Masterharper Robinton, with his sharp intelligence, his weakness for Benden wine, his wit and his generous heart; when he and Menolly were alone on the boat in Dragondrums I thought, "At last, at last!!" but the silly tart thwarted me, a betrayal for which I still have never quite forgiven her.
Next: a toss-up between Lord Peter Wimsey -- war hero, collector of incunabula, and sooo very persistently faithful -- and Laurie R. King's Sherlock Holmes. The scene with Peter and Harriet on the bank of the river is one of the all-time sexiest scenes ever, even though they never touch each other, and the night that Holmes tasks Mary Russell with wanting to propose to him caused me to cheer out loud.
You'll notice that Aragorn, Legolas, Boromir, Eomer & Co. are conspicuously absent. They were a bit too distant for me when I first encountered them, I think -- I was eleven, and at the time they all struck me as rather biblical, probably due to Tolkien's elevated language. Snape is also absent from this list since he didn't ring my bell until I saw Alan Rickman. After that it was very hubba hubba, but I don't feel right about including him in this list when it was a real person that actually spurred my interest.
So tell me, who are/were your fictional (book) crushes and why?
My next fictional crush was Laurie from Little Women (so sweet and funny and romantic, and played the piano with such passion -- Jo, how could you turn him down?!) closely followed by Dan from Jo's Boys (my black-eyed wounded rebel soul, I'm still sad he didn't win the heart of Bess).
Then I read Dragonsong and fell hard for Masterharper Robinton, with his sharp intelligence, his weakness for Benden wine, his wit and his generous heart; when he and Menolly were alone on the boat in Dragondrums I thought, "At last, at last!!" but the silly tart thwarted me, a betrayal for which I still have never quite forgiven her.
Next: a toss-up between Lord Peter Wimsey -- war hero, collector of incunabula, and sooo very persistently faithful -- and Laurie R. King's Sherlock Holmes. The scene with Peter and Harriet on the bank of the river is one of the all-time sexiest scenes ever, even though they never touch each other, and the night that Holmes tasks Mary Russell with wanting to propose to him caused me to cheer out loud.
You'll notice that Aragorn, Legolas, Boromir, Eomer & Co. are conspicuously absent. They were a bit too distant for me when I first encountered them, I think -- I was eleven, and at the time they all struck me as rather biblical, probably due to Tolkien's elevated language. Snape is also absent from this list since he didn't ring my bell until I saw Alan Rickman. After that it was very hubba hubba, but I don't feel right about including him in this list when it was a real person that actually spurred my interest.
So tell me, who are/were your fictional (book) crushes and why?
"...Here is a book that will break your heart." C.S. Lewis, on The Lord of the Rings.
Benjamin Harff, a German art student, has made this doubly true. He decided for his capstone project to do a hand-illuminated, hand-bound copy of Tolkien's The Silmarillion. He spent six months on it and had the volume bound in leather by a professional hand book-binder (he assisted).
It is the most beautiful thing I've seen, such a remarkable labor of love and art.
Here are pictures, and an interview + more pictures.
In these days of 140-character tweets and instant this-n-that, my heart is reassured when I see evidence of appreciation for Things That Take Time.
Also of course we wants it precious, we wants it!!!
Benjamin Harff, a German art student, has made this doubly true. He decided for his capstone project to do a hand-illuminated, hand-bound copy of Tolkien's The Silmarillion. He spent six months on it and had the volume bound in leather by a professional hand book-binder (he assisted).
It is the most beautiful thing I've seen, such a remarkable labor of love and art.
Here are pictures, and an interview + more pictures.
In these days of 140-character tweets and instant this-n-that, my heart is reassured when I see evidence of appreciation for Things That Take Time.
Also of course we wants it precious, we wants it!!!
It's not my fault. It's circulating.
irishredlass gave it to me. Or rather, she posted it and I can't say no to anything involving books, so I had to do it, so if I look like a showoff who's read, like, everything (or at least 70% of the list), blame her, heh heh heh...
The Big Read reckons that the average adult has only read 6 of the top 100 books they've printed.
1.) Look at the list and bold those you have read.
2.) Italicize those you intend to read.
3.) Underline those you LOVE.
4.) Put an asterisk next to the books you'd rather shove hot pokers in your eyes than read.
( The list, it be here )
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
The Big Read reckons that the average adult has only read 6 of the top 100 books they've printed.
1.) Look at the list and bold those you have read.
2.) Italicize those you intend to read.
3.) Underline those you LOVE.
4.) Put an asterisk next to the books you'd rather shove hot pokers in your eyes than read.
( The list, it be here )
Hope everyone had a satisfying (please check one):
[ ] Christmas
[ ] Solstice
[ ] Kwanzaa
[ ] Hanukkah
[ ] Other _______________
Holy cow, did I get books for Christmas!! Spouse went onto my GoodReads "To Read" list and shopped from that. Brilliant :D I have three Sheri Teppers (the Jinian trilogy) and a Patricia McKillip (The Throme of the Erril of Sherril with a bonus short story about an ice dragon), the seriously creepy (I know because I already ripped through it Christmas morning) Clockwork by Philip Pullman, two books on witchcraft in medieval Europe (recommended by
ennyousai), Salman Rushdie's The Satanic Verses which I've wanted to read forever, and Dorothy Sayers' The Mind of the Maker, about creativity/creation.
Best of all, a signed copy of Those Across the River!! This is a Southern gothic horror novel by Christopher Buehlmann, whom we know from the Ren Fest circuit (his alter ego is Christoph the Insulter LOL!). The book's gotten all kinds of stellar reviews and is already being turned into a movie.
I also got lots of chocolate. So I know what I'm doing all week. But what to dive into first?!?
[ ] Christmas
[ ] Solstice
[ ] Kwanzaa
[ ] Hanukkah
[ ] Other _______________
Holy cow, did I get books for Christmas!! Spouse went onto my GoodReads "To Read" list and shopped from that. Brilliant :D I have three Sheri Teppers (the Jinian trilogy) and a Patricia McKillip (The Throme of the Erril of Sherril with a bonus short story about an ice dragon), the seriously creepy (I know because I already ripped through it Christmas morning) Clockwork by Philip Pullman, two books on witchcraft in medieval Europe (recommended by
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Best of all, a signed copy of Those Across the River!! This is a Southern gothic horror novel by Christopher Buehlmann, whom we know from the Ren Fest circuit (his alter ego is Christoph the Insulter LOL!). The book's gotten all kinds of stellar reviews and is already being turned into a movie.
I also got lots of chocolate. So I know what I'm doing all week. But what to dive into first?!?
Yo, Publishers!
2 December 2011 10:45 pmThe Librarian By Day blog has a great post entitled Nine reasons publishers should stop acting like libraries are the enemy and start thanking them. I'm particularly fond of #4: "Archives - We keep copies of your older books that the bookstores have sold at discount prices or gotten rid of. We will buy additional copies when the ones we have get old or lost or stolen."
As an archivist I approve of this and would have put it at #1, but at least it's in the top 5.
She also points out that "For children we are a magical place where they can check out 20 or 50 books a week and take them home to read or for parents to read those books." My mother still loves to tell the story about the first time she took me an actual bookstore when I was about five. I'd only ever been to the library before, so of course I wandered the store and ended up with about thirty books in my pile. I was traumatized to find out that I could in fact only have TWO, and promptly went back to doing my shopping at libraries for the next ten years.
When I was fifteen, of course, I got a job and my own disposable income, most of which I now dispose of on books (better job = more book money!). Since then I haven't gone longer than a week without buying at least one book, which only goes to show that working is a bad idea; I should have stayed unemployed and stuck with libraries.
As an archivist I approve of this and would have put it at #1, but at least it's in the top 5.
She also points out that "For children we are a magical place where they can check out 20 or 50 books a week and take them home to read or for parents to read those books." My mother still loves to tell the story about the first time she took me an actual bookstore when I was about five. I'd only ever been to the library before, so of course I wandered the store and ended up with about thirty books in my pile. I was traumatized to find out that I could in fact only have TWO, and promptly went back to doing my shopping at libraries for the next ten years.
When I was fifteen, of course, I got a job and my own disposable income, most of which I now dispose of on books (better job = more book money!). Since then I haven't gone longer than a week without buying at least one book, which only goes to show that working is a bad idea; I should have stayed unemployed and stuck with libraries.
Proof that I am disturbed
12 October 2011 11:17 pmI have five -- count 'em, five -- books that I am reading AT THE SAME TIME. Granted, they're five very different books (Victorian bad-boy fiction, librarians are awesome, medieval roman a clef, women's colonial history, and World War II brit-love), that still seems excessive. Some have been lingering a long time, I admit. The WWII book has been in progress since, oh, May of last year, but hey, it's still on my nightstand within the top 5" of the pile, so it counts, right?
This is the only way I can read multiple books. If I were to try to read two or three fantasy novels at the same time, or two or three histories, my brain would go all bobcat-pretzel on me. But as long as I can file each one in a separate location, I seem to be able to deal with it. I'm not sure this is necessarily a good thing. Many recent articles debunk the Myth of Multitasking (apparently we can't do it, we just THINK we can), so perhaps I'm really only half-reading -- or in this case, 20-percent-reading -- each of them. But I disagree. When I'm reading one, I'm totally involved in it. I don't read a page of this one, a page of that one, a page of the other one. That would be multitasking (and actually a pretty accurate description of what I do at work, where I'm constantly discovering a window buried underneath several others, and saying "Oh look, I totally forgot I was in the middle of that email/document/analysis/presentation/YouTube video..."). Reading a chapter or two of a different book each night is more like having something different for dinner, eating what you're hungry for instead of having turkey every night for a week.
So yeah, I'm OK with the multiple book maintenance thing. Anyone else do this? Or is it just me?
This is the only way I can read multiple books. If I were to try to read two or three fantasy novels at the same time, or two or three histories, my brain would go all bobcat-pretzel on me. But as long as I can file each one in a separate location, I seem to be able to deal with it. I'm not sure this is necessarily a good thing. Many recent articles debunk the Myth of Multitasking (apparently we can't do it, we just THINK we can), so perhaps I'm really only half-reading -- or in this case, 20-percent-reading -- each of them. But I disagree. When I'm reading one, I'm totally involved in it. I don't read a page of this one, a page of that one, a page of the other one. That would be multitasking (and actually a pretty accurate description of what I do at work, where I'm constantly discovering a window buried underneath several others, and saying "Oh look, I totally forgot I was in the middle of that email/document/analysis/presentation/YouTube video..."). Reading a chapter or two of a different book each night is more like having something different for dinner, eating what you're hungry for instead of having turkey every night for a week.
So yeah, I'm OK with the multiple book maintenance thing. Anyone else do this? Or is it just me?
Did I buy more books? You betcha!!
1 July 2009 07:01 pmSo last week I took Friday off (trying desperately to use up all my vacation before it vanishes, courtesy of the Evil HR Dept). We drove over to Ithaca, checked out the Falls, had lunch at Moosewood (salmon chowder, nom nom nom), and stopped at The Phoenix used book barn on the way back. I love shopping at used bookstores, especially ones that are a) so huge they have no idea what they have, e.g. The Strand in NYC or b) so off the beaten path that they don't feel compelled to keep on hand ten copies of "A is for Alibi" and three of everything Jodi Picoult ever wrote. The Phoenix, happily, is both. (It's so off the beaten path it doesn't even have a website, and so huge that I got lost in it. Twice.)
So. Among other gems, I found a book by a long-time favorite author that I didn't know existed, a book on the Midrash (which I've been curious about since I read The Red Tent last week) and an FSF short story collection by an author I never heard of but which turned out to be tremendous: Speaking in Tongues, by Ian McDonald. Unusual, powerful, intriguing, and every story very different from the others. Among them was one with the odd title "Floating Dogs," which is possibly the most heart-wrenching -- and damning -- post-apocalypse story I've ever read. Well OK, it's a tie with "People of Sand and Slag" from this anthology. If you can read these two stories and not get at least a little choked up, I don't wanna know you.
Still plodding through the run-up to World War II with Churchill & Co., but have to take these little breaks every so often to recover from the repeated idiocies (how could Chamberlain have thought giving Czechoslovakia to Hitler was a good idea? How???)
So. Among other gems, I found a book by a long-time favorite author that I didn't know existed, a book on the Midrash (which I've been curious about since I read The Red Tent last week) and an FSF short story collection by an author I never heard of but which turned out to be tremendous: Speaking in Tongues, by Ian McDonald. Unusual, powerful, intriguing, and every story very different from the others. Among them was one with the odd title "Floating Dogs," which is possibly the most heart-wrenching -- and damning -- post-apocalypse story I've ever read. Well OK, it's a tie with "People of Sand and Slag" from this anthology. If you can read these two stories and not get at least a little choked up, I don't wanna know you.
Still plodding through the run-up to World War II with Churchill & Co., but have to take these little breaks every so often to recover from the repeated idiocies (how could Chamberlain have thought giving Czechoslovakia to Hitler was a good idea? How???)
Bookstore indulgences
30 March 2009 09:58 pmWent to B&N on Saturday for coffee. For me, it's the most expensive coffee on the planet, usually costing at least $30 since I can't NOT buy a book or two. Or three. This time I bought three: two that are on my to-read list and one, a YA fantasy that leaped off the shelf and thrust itself into my hands, mostly due to the title and cover (The Forest of Hands and Teeth). Yay! New goodies!! I felt almost virtuous about it, since they were running a special where some percentage of your total went to a local public library. Yay! New goodies AND supporting my local library!! Now the torment: do I stick with Purgatorio, as I promised myself? Or do I take a brief foray into something else before plunging into epic poetry once more? Julia Barrett's Presumption is calling me back to Pemberley and FitzWilliam Darcy...
Speaking of epic poetry, I intended to buy a copy of The Aeneid while there but the plethora of translations intimidated me. I knew I wanted one that's actual poetry, so could dismiss out of hand the ones written as prose novels, but beyond that I had no idea. Tried to compare two of the translations but the line numbers were all askew. Will have to research a bit. (Sadly, D. Sayers appears not to have done one!)
Speaking of epic poetry, I intended to buy a copy of The Aeneid while there but the plethora of translations intimidated me. I knew I wanted one that's actual poetry, so could dismiss out of hand the ones written as prose novels, but beyond that I had no idea. Tried to compare two of the translations but the line numbers were all askew. Will have to research a bit. (Sadly, D. Sayers appears not to have done one!)
Well, the deadline for the first week of SSIAW was midnight last night and I turned in zilch. Bad writer! ::smacks self with rolled-up copy of Publisher's Weekly:: Ten people turned in 14 stories, shaming the rest of us miserably. Well, shaming me, anyway. Of course I promised myself I would do four stories for the month, not necessarily one each week, so can still meet my self-imposed quota if I rock out for the rest of the month.
On the plus side I chose and posted the readings for my students for next week, finished editing for one of my Malaysian clients, worked through a couple of scenes in a vampire short I have in progress, got to beta some tasty fic from
noeon (who paid in a bottle of virtual Veuve -- what good taste she has!), and read a very well-done and technically-challenging poem from
nursedarry. So I can't say it was all wasted time.
Unfortunately, I also went toBooks and Coffee Barnes and Noble this morning and bought yet another book, which is leering and beckoning to me from the coffee table. Damn you, Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle!!!
On the plus side I chose and posted the readings for my students for next week, finished editing for one of my Malaysian clients, worked through a couple of scenes in a vampire short I have in progress, got to beta some tasty fic from
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Unfortunately, I also went to