![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
"In the early 1590s, Shakespeare sat down to write a play that addressed a problem: How could a great country wind up being governed by a sociopath?...Shakespeare’s words have an uncanny ability to reach out beyond their original time and place and to speak directly to us. We have long looked to him, in times of perplexity and risk, for the most fundamental human truths. So it is now..."
Read more ===>
Read more ===>
no subject
Date: 2016-10-09 03:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-10-09 06:01 pm (UTC)I think it's worth noting, at the end of Richard III, the villain is killed offstage, and we never see his body. It's as if the entire play wants to forget what happened and sweep it under the rug. May our current Richard III end up the equivalent of forgotten underneath a Leicester car park.
no subject
Date: 2016-10-09 11:29 pm (UTC)When people talk about Richard III, I usually see people comparing Shakespeare's version of the character with the actual king and complaining about the character assassination. But this, damn, this is brilliant.
Thanks for the pointer.
no subject
Date: 2016-10-10 05:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-10-12 09:06 am (UTC)