delphipsmith: (bookgasm)
The World Science Fiction Conventio, aka WorldCon, (which I swear I will get to someday, like maybe next year since it's in Spokane) is where the Hugo Awards are given out. If you read much F/SF at all you've probably heard of the Hugos -- they're basically the equivalent of the Academy Awards for science fiction and fantasy. There are Hugos for Best Novel, Best Novelette, Best Professional Editor, etc. (Fic writers note: there are also Hugos for Best Fan Artist, Fan Writer, and Fancast!!).

WorldCon is also where the John W. Campbell Award for Best New Writer is bestowed. And now, you can read over a hundred stories eligible for the Campbell Award FOR FREE. Some brilliant person has compiled them all into The 2014 Campbellian Anthology.

I am soooooo excited!!

"A little over a year ago, a small group of us had a crazy idea. What if, we said, there was a way everyone eligible for the Campbell could publicize their work at the same time, so that readers might have some idea of who we are?...The volume you now hold in your hands...includes a multitude of works from 111 contributors, spanning more than 860,000 words..."

Read the full post (with download links) > > >

On a semi-related note, if any of you have a novel sitting around gathering dust (*koff*[livejournal.com profile] anna_bird*koff*), there's a new publisher in town and they're looking for submissions: Story Spring Publishing, click on "Submissions." Go ye and submit!
delphipsmith: (allyourbase)
Working my way through Neil Stephenson's Anathem. Holy cow. Talk about a demanding read -- mathematics, religion, linguistics, music, philosophy, astronautics, physics, metaphysics, not to mention herbology, cosmology, quantum mechanics, and change-ringing!! This book has it all. For the first hundred pages I floundered along in a daze, feeling rather like someone in a language immersion program trying to live and breathe a completely alien communication medium, until suddenly it clicked around page 250. So far I've recognized Plato and a few other core philosophical approaches (though I don't know them well enough to put a name to them -- what, or who, is the opposite of Plato?).

Fraa Erasmas' descriptions of the urban youth, with their "caps with beverage logos," made me giggle, while the enormous expanse of time that is the backdrop to the mathic view of the outer (extramural) world is breathtaking. It's reminiscent of Asimov's Foundation series, only the Foundation is looking forwards while the maths have a multiple-millennia perspective on the past.

Stephenson must be a terrifyingly intelligent person. The most complicated concepts are presented so simply, and yet without the slightest sense of shallowness; there's a depth of comprehension behind it that's staggering. And I want a sphere!!
delphipsmith: (shiny)
Agh, agh, agh. How is possible to be reading not one, not two, but THREE books at the same time?? Not to mention breaks for The Economist, Newsweek, The Hedgehog Review, and my local paper. It ought to be impossible. The sheer number of words beating on my skull ought to somehow cancel each other out, or the most interesting ones ought (by the law of survival of the fittest) to beat the %&*^ out of the other ones until they limp quietly away. And yet it does not happen. I lug multiple books to work with me, in the insane belief that in a 45-minute lunch hour I can somehow inhale all of them, or at least some of each of them. I pile them next to my bed at night, in the happy delusion that in the half hour between the time I lie down and the moment at which my eyelids acquire a weight of roughly 2.6 earth normal, I will wade through a chapter or two of each.

I need an intervention. Or an external hard drive I can plug into my head. Or something.

Currently I'm working on a ginormous behemoth of a book, Neil Stephenson's Anathem, which in addition to weighing about eight pounds has the dubious distinction of more made-up words per page than anything I've ever read anywhere, including Clockwork Orange. It's so brain-straining that I have to take breaks and work on the next Sandman volume. Which is short, so in between those I've got a new bio of Anne Boleyn -- yay! At least that one's vaguely topical since the Ren Fest is going on and we're there every weekend in garb. ("Say it now and say it loud, I'm a Rennie and I'm proud!")

So there you go. A little TMI about my addiction to the written word. Go stories! Go words!! Go narrative!!!
delphipsmith: (kaboom)
...or so Ben Macintrye says in this article in The Guardian. This decline is, he charges, due to our inability to either produce or consume sustained narratives longer than 140 characters, or at best a blog post.

"If the culprit is obvious, so is the primary victim of this radically reduced attention span: the narrative, the long-form story, the tale. Like some endangered species, the story now needs defending from the threat of extinction in a radically changed and inhospitable digital environment."

I'm not sure I agree with all of what he says -- other studies counter this by claiming to demonstrate that, for example, online searching improves certain higher brain functions like decision-making and even staves off dementia -- but his point that it's stories that fascinate us, teach us, make us human is a good one. He says, for example, that Obama won the election in no small part because of his story: the poor upbringing, the struggle for identity, etc. And clearly we're fascinated with all kinds of people's stories, as witness by the plethora of reality television. But I'm not sure that qualifies as a "sustained narrative" since we consume it in dribs and drabs.

And besides it's such a fake narrative. Now a novel is a completely fake narrative in that it's made up, but somehow it seems more real than reality shows (and how weird is THAT?). I mean, how much do I really have in common with the Bridezillas or those strange sad people on Hoarders? I have a lot more in common with Bridget Jones or Elizabeth Bennet, or even Scarlett O'Hara, for that matter.

The attention span criticism may be a valid one; I know from personal time-wasting experience how easy it is to flit from one article to another, from blog entry to news article to photo collection to funny-animal-video to LJ to email and then back around again; in twenty minutes I can end up with as many tabs open in Firefox and no idea how I got to any of them (now there's a missing narrative for you: how do you get from the tragedy in Haiti to "Oh hai -- I can haz cookie?" in six clicks or less?). Maybe it's a sign of my own lack of self-control but I have a very tough time reading a lengthy article online.

Stories give us context, history, a knowledge of where we came from and perhaps where we might choose to go (or serve as cautionary tales about where not to go!). Without them, he seems to suggest, we are at risk of becoming indifferent and ignorant little mayflies that flutter about happily and indiscriminately in the ever-changing Now of cyberspace while Santayana weeps into his Rioja.

And yet Stephen King still publishes behemoths like Under the Dome and thousands of people buy it! So it seems we're not in imminent danger just yet. Rest easy, Ben.
delphipsmith: (PIcard face-palm)
Not content with slogging through Churchill's magnum-opus (or as Baldrick would say, his magnificent octopus), The History of World War II in six doorstoppy volumes (plus vast numbers of appendices -- weighs almost as much as the man himself), I've also started re-reading Stephen King's seven-volume Dark Tower series. I really must be some kind of glutton for punishment. At least there's no possibility of getting the plots confused, what with the crazy evil dude who wants to destroy the world in one, and the crazy evil dude who wants...hmmm.

I'd forgotten that so little happens in The Gunslinger. However, things are hopping on the other front: Hitler has finally invaded Poland, the Royal Oak has been sunk in Scapa Flow, and Winston takes every opportunity to remind us that the valiant British will always rise up to defeat tyranny and fight for freedom no matter the cost (cue bugles and a jolly jack tar singing Heart of Oak). Bold words from a short fat man with a cigar.

Ooh! Must share this hilarious website I discovered recently: Judge a Book by its Cover, a collection of "truly hideous book covers" with humorous commentary. Fave so far is this one -- "... and somewhere, a letter "L" runs free ..." bwahahahaaaa!
delphipsmith: (library)
Yesterday AbeBooks posted a summer reading list of the world's best doorstops or, to use a more literary term, "the 15 best single-volume behemoths." From David Foster Wallace's Infinite Jest to Atlas Shrugged, these are serious bricks; although there are a couple of slackers in the 900s, most are over a thousand pages. On the minus side, you may get carpal tunnel before you're through; on the plus side, if you enjoy one of these, there's plenty of it to love.

To my great pride and everlasting glory (yay me!), I have read seven of them in total, and in fact four of them I've read several times. Among the latter is the (unabridged) Count of Monte Cristo, which is an AWESOME book I return to over and over again, though not one to be tackled lightly. (Literally -- it weighs about 3lbs. Get it on the Kindle if you can.)

Pound for pound I may have read my own weight in books just off this list.

Profile

delphipsmith: (Default)
delphipsmith

December 2022

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
1819202122 2324
2526 2728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 6 August 2025 07:53 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios